COMPARE · Reviewed July 2, 2026
FLOC vs GPOR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FLOC scored 69.6, GPOR scored 67 — FLOC ahead by 2.5999999999999943.
FLOC
Flowco Holdings Inc.
69.6
$20.74
Score gap
2.5999999999999943
FLOC leads
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
67
$168.87
The companies
FLOCFlowco Holdings Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $2.2b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $28.26 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +32% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.40 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $31.56 (implying +52% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
GPORGulfport Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $3.0b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $225.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +48% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.13 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $242.00 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
Net margin 36% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Base grades (each contributes ~14.3% of base composite)
| FLOC | Component | GPOR |
|---|---|---|
| C65 | FCF | C65 |
| A95 | Rev | A95 |
| A-90 | D/E | B80 |
| B80 | P/E or P/S | A95 |
| A95 | PEG | A95 |
| Supplemental signals · feed the score, not on the row card | ||
| A-90 | FCF Yield | A95 |
| B80 | ROE | A95 |
| 85.4 | Base composite | 89.3 |
Adjustments (signed deltas applied on top of base)
FLOC
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
analyst consensus bullish (89% buy/strong-buy)+2
forward P/E cheaper (17 → 12)+1
DCF cross-check (avg upside 87%)+1
Total+5
GPOR
compounder synergy (FCF yield ≥5% + ROE ≥15% + D/E <1)+4
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
analyst consensus tilt buy (62%)+1
DCF cross-check (avg upside 152%)+2
Total+8
DCF cross-check (per-share value vs. live price)
| FLOC upside | Horizon | GPOR upside |
|---|---|---|
| +53% | 1Y | +100% |
| +80% | 5Y | +141% |
| +129% | 10Y | +216% |
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.