Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FLNC scored 32.4, TDG scored 74.9 — TDG leads.
Compare another set
FLNC
Fluence Energy Inc
Electrical Equipment · Quality-Growth
32.4
$7.43 · $1.4B
Score gap
42.5
TDG leads
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
74.9
$1,107.99 · $61.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthTDG+16.6%
Highest qualityTDG82 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FLNC
stronger →← stronger
TDG
34
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
61
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
83
16
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
TDG is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FLNC
TDG
-$115mF
FCF
$1.9bC+
+7.5%B
Rev
+16.6%B+
0.00A
D/E
Negative equity
0.5xA
P/S
—
—
PEG
3.05D
—
P/E
33.6xC+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FLNC
TDG
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
54% above
—
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~22%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-45%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-35%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-17%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FLNC
Why this score
Buying back stock
TDG
Why this score
Durable high returns
The companies
FLNCFluence Energy Inc
Electrical Equipment · $7.43 · beta 2.79
Why now
Electrical Equipment · market cap $1.4b. Down 78% from 52-week high of $33.51 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$115m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -3.1%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 78% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
TDGTransDigm Group Incorporated
Aerospace & Defense · $1,107.99 · beta 0.94
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $61.2b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $1463.03 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $1,448 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. $61.2b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 34x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FLNC and TDG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 42.5 points in favor of TDG. The widest single difference is Quality, where TDG leads by 47.5 points.
QualityFLNC 34.5 · TDG 82.0TDG +47.5
ValueFLNC 16.3 · TDG 61.8TDG +45.5
GrowthFLNC 60.6 · TDG 82.9TDG +22.3
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is TDG or FLNC the better stock?
TDG scores higher: TDG 74.9, FLNC 32.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do TDG and FLNC differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where TDG leads by 48 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. TDG leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are TDG and FLNC scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.