COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FIX vs GFF
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FIX scored 56.3, GFF scored 77.9 — GFF leads.
Compare another set
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
56.3
$1,655.61 · $58.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
21.6
GFF leads
GFF
Griffon Corporation
77.9
$100.55 · $4.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGFF21.0x
- Fastest growthGFF+26.9%
- Highest qualityFIX88 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FIX
stronger →← stronger
GFF
88
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
44
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
80
46
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
73
GFF is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FIX
GFF
$2.2bB
FCF
$297mC
-48.5%F
Rev
+26.9%A-
0.45B+
D/E
—
40.8xC
P/E
21.0xB+
0.74A-
PEG
0.54A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FIX
GFF
89% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
9% above
~32%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~11%/yr
-58%
1-yr DCF upside
-20%
-47%
5-yr DCF upside
-8%
-27%
10-yr DCF upside
+11%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FIX
Why this score
- Durable high returns
GFF
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
FIXComfort Systems USA, Inc.
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $58.3b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $2073.99 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -48% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. PEG 0.74 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $2,211 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Net margin 36% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 45% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 151% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Revenue contracting -48% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Beta 1.70 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 41x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
GFFGriffon Corporation
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $4.6b. 7% off the 52-week high of $108.57. Revenue growing +27% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.54 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $125.57 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 166% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FIX and GFF diverge
On the headline score the gap is 21.6 points in favor of GFF. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthFIX 44.5 · GFF 79.9GFF +35.4
- ValueFIX 45.6 · GFF 73.4GFF +27.8
- QualityFIX 88.0 · GFF 80.5FIX +7.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.