COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
FIVE vs ROST
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FIVE scored 71.2, ROST scored 46.5 — FIVE leads.
Compare another set
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
71.2
$262.72 · $14.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
24.7
FIVE leads
ROST
Ross Stores, Inc.
46.5
$241.52 · $77.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestROST28.9x
- Fastest growthFIVE+25.9%
- Strongest balance sheetROST0.70
- Highest qualityROST83 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FIVE
stronger →← stronger
ROST
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
83
94
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
53
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
16
FIVE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FIVE
ROST
$505mC+
FCF
$2.6bB
+25.9%A-
Rev
+11.9%B
0.86B
D/E
0.70B+
31.5xC
P/E
28.9xC+
0.98B+
PEG
2.82C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FIVE
ROST
72% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
66% above
~19%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~18%/yr
-45%
1-yr DCF upside
-43%
-42%
5-yr DCF upside
-40%
-36%
10-yr DCF upside
-35%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FIVE
Why this score
- Durable high returns
ROST
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
FIVEFive Below, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $14.5b. Trading near 52-week high of $263.87 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.98 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $270.05 (implying +3% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 0% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Trailing P/E 32x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
ROSTRoss Stores, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Retail · market cap $77.5b. 6% off the 52-week high of $257.00. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $269.94 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
ROE 37% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $77.5b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FIVE and ROST diverge
On the headline score the gap is 24.7 points in favor of FIVE. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueFIVE 52.8 · ROST 16.3FIVE +36.5
- GrowthFIVE 94.3 · ROST 74.5FIVE +19.8
- QualityFIVE 72.7 · ROST 82.6ROST +9.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.