Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FIGR scored 77.0, IX scored 77.0 — tied at the top.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. FIGR's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but IX's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FIGR
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.
Capital Markets · Financial strength
54.4Fin
$28.54 · $6.4B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
14.9
IX leads
IX
ORIX Corporation
Financial Conglomerates · Financial strength
69.3Fin
$36.95 · $39.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestIX10.3x
Fastest growthFIGR+55.7%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FIGR
IX
+55.7%A
Rev
+18.6%B+
30.7xD
P/E
10.3xA-
26.1%A-
ROE
—
4.52D
P/B
—
0.0%C
Yield
—
—
FCF
$235mC
—
D/E
1.30C+
—
PEG
2.72C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
FIGRFigure Technology Solutions, Inc.
Capital Markets · $28.54
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $6.4b. Down 63% from 52-week high of $78.00 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +56% — in hypergrowth territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $53.00 (implying +86% upside).
Moat
Net margin 38% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Down 63% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 31x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. P/S 10.3x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
IXORIX Corporation
Financial Conglomerates · $36.95 · beta 0.74
Why now
Financial Conglomerates · market cap $39.8b. 13% off the 52-week high of $42.39. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is FIGR or IX the better stock?
On the Bull Rankings quality-growth score they are level: FIGR and IX both score 77.0 out of 100. The score blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number, so a tie means the model sees no meaningful edge either way — the pillar breakdown on this page shows where each is actually stronger.
How are FIGR and IX scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.