COMPARE · Data as of October 13, 2026

FHI vs SEIC

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FHI scored 80.0, SEIC scored 77.0 — FHI leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. SEIC's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but FHI's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.
Asset Management · Financial strength
88.7Fin
$54.15 · $4.0B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
17.2
FHI leads
SEIC
SEI Investments Company
Asset Management · Financial strength
71.5Fin
$105.09 · $12.6B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestFHI10.1x
  • Fastest growthFHI+10.3%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD88.7/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANASSET MGR88.7
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD71.5/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANASSET MGR71.5
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-2%20%5.1x24xFHISEIC

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

RevFHI+10.3%SEIC+8.1%
P/EFHI10.1xSEIC18.5x
ROEFHI31.1%SEIC27.6%
P/BFHI3.20SEIC5.04
YieldFHI2.5%SEIC1.0%
FHI
SEIC
+10.3%B
Rev
+8.1%B
10.1xA-
P/E
18.5xC
31.1%A
ROE
27.6%A-
3.20C
P/B
5.04D
2.5%B
Yield
1.0%C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
FHIFederated Hermes, Inc.
Asset Management · $54.15 · beta 0.64
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $4.0b. 19% off the 52-week high of $67.20. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $59.43 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
SEICSEI Investments Company
Asset Management · $105.09 · beta 0.97
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $12.6b. 6% off the 52-week high of $112.15. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $117.50 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Credit-cycle exposure — provisions tend to lag actual loan deterioration by 2-3 quarters; a sharp uptick in net charge-offs is a leading indicator the market often misses until it's already priced.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is FHI or SEIC the better stock?

FHI scores higher: FHI 80.0, SEIC 77.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are FHI and SEIC scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.