COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
FHI vs NTRS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FHI scored 77.0, NTRS scored 66.0 — FHI leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. NTRS's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but FHI's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.
85.6Fin
$64.41 · $4.8B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
14.9
FHI leads
NTRS
Northern Trust Corporation
70.7Fin
$186.79 · $34.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFHI12.1x
- Fastest growthFHI+10.3%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FHI
NTRS
+10.3%B
Rev
-2.5%D+
12.1xB+
P/E
16.0xC+
31.1%A
ROE
17.1%B+
3.67C
P/B
2.73C+
2.2%B
Yield
1.8%C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
FHIFederated Hermes, Inc.
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $4.8b. 4% off the 52-week high of $67.20. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $61.14 (implying -5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
NTRSNorthern Trust Corporation
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $34.2b. 5% off the 52-week high of $195.78. 13 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $184.27 (implying -1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 25% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.