COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

FHI vs MAIN

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FHI scored 80.0, MAIN scored 72.0 — FHI leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. MAIN's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but FHI's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.
Asset Management · Financial strength
88.6Fin
$56.52 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
3.2
FHI leads
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
Asset Management · Financial strength
85.4Fin
$53.74 · $5.0B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestFHI10.4x
  • Fastest growthFHI+10.3%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD88.6/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANASSET MGR88.6
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD85.4/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANASSET MGR85.4
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-12%20%5.4x16xFHIMAIN

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

RevFHI+10.3%MAIN-1.6%
P/EFHI10.4xMAIN10.9x
ROEFHI31.1%MAIN14.3%
P/BFHI3.22MAIN1.58
YieldFHI2.6%MAIN5.8%
FHI
MAIN
+10.3%B
Rev
-1.6%D+
10.4xA-
P/E
10.9xB+
31.1%A
ROE
14.3%B
3.22C
P/B
1.58B
2.6%B
Yield
5.8%A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
FHIFederated Hermes, Inc.
Asset Management · $56.52 · beta 0.64
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $4.2b. 16% off the 52-week high of $67.20. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $60.14 (implying +6% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
MAINMain Street Capital Corporation
Asset Management · $53.74 · beta 0.75
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $5.0b. 18% off the 52-week high of $65.23. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $59.86 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 78% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Dividend payout 86% of earnings on a 5.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Regulatory capital risk — stricter capital requirements (CCAR, Basel) can force a dividend cut or a capital raise; the largest banks are most exposed because they're held to the tightest standards.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is FHI or MAIN the better stock?

FHI scores higher: FHI 80.0, MAIN 72.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are FHI and MAIN scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.