Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FHI scored 80.0, AMP scored 80.0 — tied at the top.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. AMP's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but FHI's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.
Asset Management · Financial strength
88.7Fin
$54.15 · $4.0B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
6.0
FHI leads
AMP
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
Asset Management · Financial strength
82.7Fin
$493.32 · $43.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestFHI10.1x
Fastest growthFHI+10.3%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FHI
AMP
+10.3%B
Rev
+7.0%B
10.1xA-
P/E
11.9xB
31.1%A
ROE
63.4%A
3.20C
P/B
6.95D
2.5%B
Yield
1.4%C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
FHIFederated Hermes, Inc.
Asset Management · $54.15 · beta 0.64
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $4.0b. 19% off the 52-week high of $67.20. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $59.43 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
AMPAmeriprise Financial, Inc.
Asset Management · $493.32 · beta 1.16
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $43.6b. 14% off the 52-week high of $572.56. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $568.45 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Net margin 20% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 63% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is FHI or AMP the better stock?
On the Bull Rankings quality-growth score they are level: FHI and AMP both score 80.0 out of 100. The score blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number, so a tie means the model sees no meaningful edge either way — the pillar breakdown on this page shows where each is actually stronger.
How are FHI and AMP scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.