COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

DNOW vs FERG

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DNOW scored 56.8, FERG scored 58.7 — FERG leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. DNOW's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but FERG's are as of July 2025 — a 11-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
DNOW
DNOW Inc.
Industrial Distribution · Quality-Growth
56.8
$15.68 · $2.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.9
FERG leads
FERG
Ferguson Enterprises Inc.
Industrial Distribution · Quality-Growth
58.7
$242.24 · $46.9B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthDNOW+69.8%
  • Strongest balance sheetDNOW0.31
  • Highest qualityFERG74 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueDNOW-21%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD56.8/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY28.3GROWTH92.5VALUE70.2
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD58.7/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY74.1GROWTH59.7VALUE45.7
DNOWFERGQuality28.374.1Growth92.559.7Value70.245.7
FCFDNOW$136mFERG$1.6b
RevDNOW+69.8%FERG+3.8%
D/EDNOW0.31FERG1.11
DNOW
stronger →← stronger
FERG
28
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
92
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
60
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
46
DNOW is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
DNOW
FERG
$136mC
FCF
$1.6bC+
+69.8%A
Rev
+3.8%C+
0.31A-
D/E
1.11C+
0.7xA
P/S
PEG
1.49B
P/E
23.9xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
DNOW
FERG
21% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
81% above
~9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~23%/yr
-4%
1-yr DCF upside
-50%
+27%
5-yr DCF upside
-45%
+91%
10-yr DCF upside
-36%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
DNOW
Why this score
  • Diluting shareholders
FERG
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
DNOWDNOW Inc.
Industrial Distribution · $15.68 · beta 0.86
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $2.8b. 9% off the 52-week high of $17.26. Revenue growing +70% — in hypergrowth territory. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $18.75 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -2.7%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
FERGFerguson Enterprises Inc.
Industrial Distribution · $242.24 · beta 1.12
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $46.9b. 11% off the 52-week high of $271.64. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $287.85 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
ROE 30% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where DNOW and FERG diverge

On the headline score the gap is 1.9 points in favor of FERG. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.