COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
FDXF vs SKYW
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FDXF scored 33.7, SKYW scored 62.4 — SKYW leads.
Compare another set
FDXF
FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc.
33.7
$141.24 · $21.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
28.7
SKYW leads
SKYW
SkyWest, Inc.
62.4
$107.23 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FDXF
stronger →← stronger
SKYW
34
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
37
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
30
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
69
SKYW is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FDXF
SKYW
-$212mF
FCF
$909mC+
-1.1%D+
Rev
+9.1%B
—
D/E
0.86C+
2.4xB
P/S
—
—
PEG
1.66C+
—
P/E
10.7xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FDXF
SKYW
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
65% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-19%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+157%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+183%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+224%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FDXF
Why this score
- Short track record
SKYW
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
The companies
FDXFFedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc.
Why now
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $21.1b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $200.00 — deep drawdown territory. 12 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $169.42 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$212m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 32x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. ROE -132% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
SKYWSkyWest, Inc.
Why now
Airlines · market cap $4.2b. 13% off the 52-week high of $123.94. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $125.17 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Beta 1.44 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FDXF and SKYW diverge
On the headline score the gap is 28.7 points in favour of SKYW. The widest single difference is Value, where SKYW leads by 38.4 points.
- ValueFDXF 30.5 · SKYW 68.9SKYW +38.4
- QualityFDXF 34.1 · SKYW 70.5SKYW +36.4
- GrowthFDXF 37.0 · SKYW 50.0SKYW +13.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.