COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
FDXF vs HAFN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FDXF scored 33.7, HAFN scored 72.0 — HAFN leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. FDXF's fundamentals are as of May 2026, but HAFN's are as of December 2024 — a 17-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FDXF
FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc.
33.7
$141.24 · $21.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
38.3
HAFN leads
HAFN
Hafnia Limited
72
$7.49 · $3.7B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FDXF
stronger →← stronger
HAFN
34
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
93
37
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
30
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
97
HAFN is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FDXF
HAFN
-$212mF
FCF
$981mC+
-1.1%D+
Rev
+7.4%B
—
D/E
0.40B+
2.4xB
P/S
—
—
P/E
8.3xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FDXF
HAFN
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
69% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
—
1-yr DCF upside
+256%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+220%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+176%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FDXF
Why this score
- Short track record
HAFN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
- Short track record
The companies
FDXFFedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc.
Why now
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $21.1b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $200.00 — deep drawdown territory. 12 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $169.42 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$212m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 32x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. ROE -132% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
HAFNHafnia Limited
Why now
Marine Shipping · market cap $3.7b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $9.54 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 34% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FDXF and HAFN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 38.3 points in favour of HAFN. The widest single difference is Value, where HAFN leads by 66.2 points.
- ValueFDXF 30.5 · HAFN 96.7HAFN +66.2
- QualityFDXF 34.1 · HAFN 93.4HAFN +59.3
- GrowthFDXF 37.0 · HAFN 50.0HAFN +13.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.