COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026

FDX vs HAFN

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FDX scored 61.4, HAFN scored 72.0 — HAFN leads.
Compare another set
FDX
FedEx Corporation
Integrated Freight & Logistics · Quality-Growth
61.4
$331.41 · $78.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.6
HAFN leads
HAFN
Hafnia Limited
Marine Shipping · Quality-Growth
72
$7.77 · $3.9B
  • CheapestHAFN8.6x
  • Fastest growthFDX+7.7%
  • Strongest balance sheetHAFN0.40
  • Highest qualityHAFN94 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueHAFN-68%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD61.4/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY55.9GROWTH61.4VALUE67.3
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY93.8GROWTH43.1VALUE96.5
FDXHAFNQuality55.993.8Growth61.443.1Value67.396.5
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-3%18%3.6x23xFDXHAFN

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFFDX$5.1bHAFN$981m
RevFDX+7.7%HAFN+7.4%
D/EFDX1.36HAFN0.40
P/EFDX17.9xHAFN8.6x
FDX
stronger →← stronger
HAFN
56
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
94
61
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
43
67
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
96
HAFN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
FDX
HAFN
$5.1bB+
FCF
$981mC+
+7.7%B
Rev
+7.4%B
1.36C
D/E
0.40B+
17.9xA-
P/E
8.6xA
1.41B
PEG
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
FDX
HAFN
2% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
68% below
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
-14%
1-yr DCF upside
+243%
+2%
5-yr DCF upside
+208%
+32%
10-yr DCF upside
+166%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
FDX
No notable signals flagged.
HAFN
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
  • Short track record
FDXFedEx Corporation
Integrated Freight & Logistics · $331.41 · beta 1.36
Why now
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $78.4b. 4% off the 52-week high of $345.37. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $356.37 (implying +8% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $78.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
HAFNHafnia Limited
Marine Shipping · $7.77 · beta -0.15
Why now
Marine Shipping · market cap $3.9b. 19% off the 52-week high of $9.54.
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 34% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where FDX and HAFN diverge

On the headline score the gap is 10.6 points in favor of HAFN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.