COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
FDX vs GXO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FDX scored 61.4, GXO scored 50.6 — FDX leads.
Compare another set
FDX
FedEx Corporation
61.4
$331.41 · $78.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.8
FDX leads
GXO
GXO Logistics, Inc.
50.6
$47.98 · $5.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFDX17.9x
- Fastest growthFDX+7.7%
- Strongest balance sheetFDX1.36
- Highest qualityFDX56 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueFDX-2%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FDX
stronger →← stronger
GXO
56
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
39
61
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
62
67
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
FDX is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FDX
GXO
$5.1bB+
FCF
$180mC
+7.7%B
Rev
+7.6%B
1.36C
D/E
2.02C
17.9xA-
P/E
42.5xC
1.41B
PEG
1.29B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FDX
GXO
2% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
122% above
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~32%/yr
-14%
1-yr DCF upside
-62%
+2%
5-yr DCF upside
-55%
+32%
10-yr DCF upside
-43%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
The companies
FDXFedEx Corporation
Why now
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $78.4b. 4% off the 52-week high of $345.37. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $356.37 (implying +8% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $78.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
GXOGXO Logistics, Inc.
Why now
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $5.5b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $66.85 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $68.71 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 137% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.02 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.55 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 42x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FDX and GXO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 10.8 points in favor of FDX. The widest single difference is Quality, where FDX leads by 16.7 points.
- QualityFDX 55.9 · GXO 39.2FDX +16.7
- ValueFDX 67.3 · GXO 53.3FDX +14.0
- GrowthFDX 61.4 · GXO 62.2level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.