COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
FDX vs GSL
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FDX scored 61.4, GSL scored 65.5 — GSL leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. FDX's fundamentals are as of May 2026, but GSL's are as of December 2025 — a 5-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FDX
FedEx Corporation
61.4
$331.41 · $78.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.1
GSL leads
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
65.5
$44.82 · $1.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGSL4.4x
- Fastest growthGSL+7.8%
- Strongest balance sheetGSL0.35
- Highest qualityGSL88 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGSL-78%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FDX
stronger →← stronger
GSL
56
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
88
61
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
44
67
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
GSL is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FDX
GSL
$5.1bB+
FCF
$521mC+
+7.7%B
Rev
+7.8%B
1.36C
D/E
0.35A-
17.9xA-
P/E
4.4xA
1.41B
PEG
0.87B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FDX
GSL
2% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
78% below
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
-14%
1-yr DCF upside
+401%
+2%
5-yr DCF upside
+350%
+32%
10-yr DCF upside
+287%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FDX
No notable signals flagged.
GSL
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
FDXFedEx Corporation
Why now
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $78.4b. 4% off the 52-week high of $345.37. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $356.37 (implying +8% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $78.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
GSLGlobal Ship Lease, Inc.
Why now
Marine Shipping · market cap $1.6b. Trading near 52-week high of $45.45 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $51.00 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
Net margin 54% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 23% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 125% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FDX and GSL diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.1 points in favor of GSL. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityFDX 55.9 · GSL 88.3GSL +32.4
- GrowthFDX 61.4 · GSL 44.2FDX +17.2
- ValueFDX 67.3 · GSL 72.1GSL +4.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.