COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

FDS vs MORN

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FDS scored 79.0, MORN scored 75.0 — FDS leads.
Compare another set
FDS
FactSet Research Systems Inc.
Financial Data & Stock Exchanges · Financial strength
60.2Fin
$287.18 · $10.2B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
1.0
FDS leads
MORN
Morningstar, Inc.
Financial Data & Stock Exchanges · Financial strength
59.2Fin
$204.45 · $7.7B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestMORN19.5x
  • Fastest growthMORN+7.5%
  • Strongest balance sheetFDS0.77
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD60.2/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL60.2
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD59.2/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL59.2
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-3%17%14x25xFDSMORN

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFFDS$708mMORN$498m
RevFDS+6.6%MORN+7.5%
D/EFDS0.77MORN1.86
P/EFDS19.7xMORN19.5x
PEGFDS1.27MORN2.31
FDS
MORN
$708mC+
FCF
$498mC
+6.6%C+
Rev
+7.5%B
0.77B
D/E
1.86C
19.7xC
P/E
19.5xC
1.27B
PEG
2.31C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
FDSFactSet Research Systems Inc.
Financial Data & Stock Exchanges · $287.18 · beta 0.77
Why now
Financial Data & Stock Exchanges · market cap $10.2b. 10% off the 52-week high of $320.48. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $278.19 (implying -3% upside).
Moat
Net margin 23% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 125% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
MORNMorningstar, Inc.
Financial Data & Stock Exchanges · $204.45 · beta 1.02
Why now
Financial Data & Stock Exchanges · market cap $7.7b. 10% off the 52-week high of $227.51. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $236.67 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 32% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 118% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is FDS or MORN the better stock?

FDS scores higher: FDS 79.0, MORN 75.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are FDS and MORN scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.