COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

FCN vs VRSK

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FCN scored 75.1, VRSK scored 69.0 — FCN leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. FCN's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but VRSK's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
Consulting Services · Quality-Growth
75.1
$155.74 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.1
FCN leads
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
Consulting Services · Quality-Growth
69
$190.15 · $24.7B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestFCN18.9x
  • Fastest growthFCN+7.1%
  • Highest qualityVRSK82 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueFCN-41%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD75.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY68.6GROWTH74.6VALUE82.7
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD69.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY82.1GROWTH70.6VALUE56.6
FCNVRSKQuality68.682.1Growth74.670.6Value82.756.6
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-4%17%14x34xFCNVRSK

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFFCN$359mVRSK$1.1b
RevFCN+7.1%VRSK+5.9%
P/EFCN18.9xVRSK29.2x
PEGFCN0.96VRSK1.77
FCN
stronger →← stronger
VRSK
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
71
83
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
57
FCN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
FCN
VRSK
$359mC
FCF
$1.1bC+
+7.1%B
Rev
+5.9%C+
0.95C+
D/E
18.9xA-
P/E
29.2xB
0.96B+
PEG
1.77C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
FCN
VRSK
41% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
12% below
~-2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
+40%
1-yr DCF upside
0%
+68%
5-yr DCF upside
+13%
+120%
10-yr DCF upside
+37%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
FCN
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
VRSK
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.
Consulting Services · $155.74 · beta -0.05
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $4.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $189.30. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
VRSKVerisk Analytics, Inc.
Consulting Services · $190.15 · beta 0.66
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $24.7b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $273.83 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $237.71 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. FCF converts 124% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -78% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
FCN leads VRSK by 3.1 points (75.3 to 72.2), its sharpest advantage coming in PEG (grade B+). A contrarian could still prefer VRSK, which trades about 14% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — FCN screens as value, VRSK screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where FCN and VRSK diverge

On the headline score the gap is 6.1 points in favor of FCN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.