COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
FCN vs RBA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FCN scored 74.9, RBA scored 63.8 — FCN leads.
Compare another set
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
74.9
$153.57 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.1
FCN leads
RBA
RB Global, Inc.
63.8
$87.02 · $16.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFCN18.6x
- Fastest growthRBA+9.7%
- Strongest balance sheetRBA0.78
- Highest qualityFCN69 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueFCN-41%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FCN
stronger →← stronger
RBA
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
60
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
71
82
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
FCN is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FCN
RBA
$359mC
FCF
$611mC+
+7.1%B
Rev
+9.7%B
0.95C+
D/E
0.78B
18.6xA-
P/E
37.5xC+
0.96B+
PEG
1.01B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FCN
RBA
41% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% below
~-2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~6%/yr
+42%
1-yr DCF upside
-7%
+71%
5-yr DCF upside
+4%
+123%
10-yr DCF upside
+23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FCN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
RBA
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $4.2b. 19% off the 52-week high of $189.30. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
RBARB Global, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $16.1b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $119.58 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $128.91 (implying +48% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 126% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 38x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FCN and RBA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 11.1 points in favor of FCN. The widest single difference is Value, where FCN leads by 20.8 points.
- ValueFCN 82.0 · RBA 61.2FCN +20.8
- QualityFCN 68.6 · RBA 59.9FCN +8.7
- GrowthFCN 74.6 · RBA 70.9FCN +3.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.