COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
DLB vs FCN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DLB scored 64.8, FCN scored 75.1 — FCN leads.
Compare another set
DLB
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
64.8
$66.10 · $6.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.3
FCN leads
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
75.1
$155.74 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFCN18.9x
- Fastest growthFCN+7.1%
- Strongest balance sheetDLB0.02
- Highest qualityDLB74 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueFCN-41%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DLB
stronger →← stronger
FCN
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
57
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
83
FCN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DLB
FCN
$345mC
FCF
$359mC
+5.9%C+
Rev
+7.1%B
0.02A
D/E
0.95C+
28.1xB
P/E
18.9xA-
1.29B
PEG
0.96B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DLB
FCN
5% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
41% below
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
+1%
1-yr DCF upside
+40%
+5%
5-yr DCF upside
+68%
+12%
10-yr DCF upside
+120%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DLB
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
FCN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
DLBDolby Laboratories, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $6.2b. 12% off the 52-week high of $75.39. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $79.00 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 152% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $4.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $189.30. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DLB and FCN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 10.3 points in favor of FCN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueDLB 56.9 · FCN 82.7FCN +25.8
- GrowthDLB 65.0 · FCN 74.6FCN +9.6
- QualityDLB 73.6 · FCN 68.6DLB +5.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.