COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AZZ vs FCN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AZZ scored 64.7, FCN scored 75.1 — FCN leads.
Compare another set
AZZ
AZZ Inc.
64.7
$141.28 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.4
FCN leads
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
75.1
$155.74 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFCN18.9x
- Fastest growthFCN+7.1%
- Strongest balance sheetAZZ0.39
- Highest qualityAZZ69 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueFCN-41%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AZZ
stronger →← stronger
FCN
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
68
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
58
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
83
FCN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AZZ
FCN
$169mC
FCF
$359mC
+5.7%C+
Rev
+7.1%B
0.39B+
D/E
0.95C+
21.5xB+
P/E
18.9xA-
1.20B+
PEG
0.96B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AZZ
FCN
58% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
41% below
~19%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
-42%
1-yr DCF upside
+40%
-37%
5-yr DCF upside
+68%
-28%
10-yr DCF upside
+120%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AZZ
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
FCN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
AZZAZZ Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $4.2b. 13% off the 52-week high of $162.20. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $164.00 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $4.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $189.30. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AZZ and FCN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 10.4 points in favor of FCN. The widest single difference is Value, where FCN leads by 25.1 points.
- ValueAZZ 57.6 · FCN 82.7FCN +25.1
- GrowthAZZ 67.9 · FCN 74.6FCN +6.7
- QualityAZZ 69.3 · FCN 68.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.