COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
FCEL vs VRT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FCEL scored 51.5, VRT scored 74.4 — VRT leads.
Compare another set
FCEL
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
51.5
$19.32 · $1.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
22.9
VRT leads
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co
74.4
$255.75 · $98.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthFCEL+41.0%
- Strongest balance sheetFCEL0.20
- Highest qualityVRT86 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FCEL
stronger →← stronger
VRT
22
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
88
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
91
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
VRT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FCEL
VRT
-$120mF
FCF
$2.9bB
+41.0%A
Rev
+26.2%A-
0.20A-
D/E
0.70B
9.2xD
P/S
—
0.36A
PEG
1.23B
—
P/E
57.9xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FCEL
VRT
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
150% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~42%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-69%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-60%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-43%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FCEL
No notable signals flagged.
VRT
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
FCELFuelCell Energy, Inc.
Why now
Electrical Equipment & Parts · market cap $1.5b. Down 49% from 52-week high of $37.88 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +41% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 6 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $22.83 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$120m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 49% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.39 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
VRTVertiv Holdings Co
Why now
Electrical Equipment & Parts · market cap $98.5b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $379.94 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $338.15 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 169% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 57.9x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.08 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FCEL and VRT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 22.9 points in favor of VRT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityFCEL 22.1 · VRT 86.2VRT +64.1
- ValueFCEL 70.1 · VRT 52.6FCEL +17.5
- GrowthFCEL 88.0 · VRT 90.8level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.