COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
FCEL vs IR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FCEL scored 51.5, IR scored 72.8 — IR leads.
Compare another set
FCEL
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
51.5
$19.32 · $1.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
21.3
IR leads
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
72.8
$78.57 · $30.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthFCEL+41.0%
- Strongest balance sheetFCEL0.20
- Highest qualityIR66 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FCEL
stronger →← stronger
IR
22
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
88
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
77
IR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FCEL
IR
-$120mF
FCF
$1.2bC+
+41.0%A
Rev
+7.8%B
0.20A-
D/E
0.48B+
9.2xD
P/S
—
0.36A
PEG
0.72A-
—
P/E
33.0xC+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FCEL
IR
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
63% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~20%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-44%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-39%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-30%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FCEL
No notable signals flagged.
IR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
FCELFuelCell Energy, Inc.
Why now
Electrical Equipment & Parts · market cap $1.5b. Down 49% from 52-week high of $37.88 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +41% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 6 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $22.83 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$120m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 49% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.39 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
IRIngersoll Rand Inc.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $30.5b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $100.96 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.72 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $96.25 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FCEL and IR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 21.3 points in favor of IR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityFCEL 22.1 · IR 65.5IR +43.4
- GrowthFCEL 88.0 · IR 76.5FCEL +11.5
- ValueFCEL 70.1 · IR 77.1IR +7.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.