COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
FAST vs FERG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FAST scored 42.5, FERG scored 62.1 — FERG leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. FAST's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but FERG's are as of July 2025 — a 11-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FAST
Fastenal Company
42.5
$51.13 · $58.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.6
FERG leads
FERG
Ferguson Enterprises Inc.
62.1
$233.26 · $45.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFERG23.0x
- Fastest growthFAST+12.5%
- Strongest balance sheetFAST0.11
- Highest qualityFAST89 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FAST
stronger →← stronger
FERG
89
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
82
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
60
11
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
54
FAST is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FAST
FERG
$1.2bC+
FCF
$1.6bC+
+12.5%B+
Rev
+3.8%C+
0.11A
D/E
1.11C+
43.7xC
P/E
23.0xB+
3.64D
PEG
1.42B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FAST
FERG
124% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
75% above
~27%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~22%/yr
-60%
1-yr DCF upside
-48%
-55%
5-yr DCF upside
-43%
-48%
10-yr DCF upside
-34%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FAST
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
FERG
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
FASTFastenal Company
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $58.7b. 3% off the 52-week high of $52.92. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $48.53 (implying -5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $58.7b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 44x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
FERGFerguson Enterprises Inc.
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $45.1b. 14% off the 52-week high of $271.64. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $288.10 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
ROE 30% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FAST and FERG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 19.6 points in favor of FERG. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueFAST 10.5 · FERG 54.1FERG +43.6
- GrowthFAST 81.9 · FERG 59.7FAST +22.2
- QualityFAST 88.8 · FERG 74.1FAST +14.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.