COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

EXPE vs YETI

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EXPE scored 67.6, YETI scored 66.3 — EXPE leads.
Compare another set
EXPE
Expedia Group, Inc.
Travel Services · Quality-Growth
67.6
$274.22 · $32.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.3
EXPE leads
YETI
YETI Holdings, Inc.
Leisure · Quality-Growth
66.3
$39.79 · $2.9B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestEXPE17.1x
  • Fastest growthEXPE+7.6%
  • Strongest balance sheetYETI0.42
  • Highest qualityYETI90 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueEXPE-52%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD67.6/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY86.7GROWTH50.0VALUE71.2
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD66.3/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY90.3GROWTH50.0VALUE64.7
EXPEYETIQuality86.790.3Growth50.050.0Value71.264.7
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-4%18%12x22xEXPEYETI

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFEXPE$4.5bYETI$257m
RevEXPE+7.6%YETI+6.2%
D/EEXPE2.30YETI0.42
P/EEXPE17.1xYETI17.4x
PEGEXPE0.71YETI1.27
EXPE
stronger →← stronger
YETI
87
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
90
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
71
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
EXPE and YETI split the three pillars evenly.
EXPE
YETI
$4.5bB
FCF
$257mC
+7.6%B
Rev
+6.2%C+
2.30C
D/E
0.42B+
17.1xB
P/E
17.4xB
0.71A-
PEG
1.27B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
EXPE
YETI
52% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
1% below
~-7%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
+76%
1-yr DCF upside
-8%
+106%
5-yr DCF upside
+1%
+158%
10-yr DCF upside
+14%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
EXPE
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
  • Cyclical growth
YETI
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Durable high returns
  • Cyclical growth
EXPEExpedia Group, Inc.
Travel Services · $274.22 · beta 1.36
Why now
Travel Services · market cap $32.9b. 20% off the 52-week high of $342.00. PEG 0.71 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 35 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $336.14 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 89% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income, mostly because of cash released from working capital ($1.5b) — a release that doesn't repeat every year the way earnings can.
Risk
D/E 2.30 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
YETIYETI Holdings, Inc.
Leisure · $39.79 · beta 1.68
Why now
Leisure · market cap $2.9b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $53.99 — deep drawdown territory. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.93 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Beta 1.68 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
EXPE and YETI score effectively even on the Bull Rankings model (68.0 versus 68.0), so none holds a clear model edge — the call comes down to which trade-off you weight more: sector exposure (Travel Services versus Leisure) and valuation.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where EXPE and YETI diverge

On the headline score the gap is 1.3 points in favor of EXPE. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.

Common questions

Is EXPE or YETI the better stock?

EXPE scores higher: EXPE 67.6, YETI 66.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

Where do EXPE and YETI differ most?

The widest gap is value, where EXPE leads by 7 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.

How are EXPE and YETI scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.