COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
EXLS vs INOD
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EXLS scored 84.1, INOD scored 77.9 — EXLS leads.
Compare another set
EXLS
ExlService Holdings, Inc.
84.1
$35.99 · $5.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.2
EXLS leads
INOD
Innodata Inc.
77.9
$55.40 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EXLS
stronger →← stronger
INOD
84
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
91
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
100
77
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
55
INOD is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EXLS
INOD
$297mC
FCF
$62mC-
+13.4%B+
Rev
+40.1%A
0.67C+
D/E
0.03A-
22.9xB+
P/E
49.5xC+
0.91B+
PEG
0.87B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EXLS
INOD
11% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
24% above
~5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~20%/yr
-1%
1-yr DCF upside
-39%
+13%
5-yr DCF upside
-19%
+35%
10-yr DCF upside
+20%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EXLS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
INOD
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
EXLSExlService Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $5.5b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $47.11 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.91 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $40.13 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 32% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 118% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
INODInnodata Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $1.8b. Down 56% from 52-week high of $125.14 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +40% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $122.75 (implying +122% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 158% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 56% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.89 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 49x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.