COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
EXEL vs INCY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EXEL scored 74.1, INCY scored 70.6 — EXEL leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. EXEL's fundamentals are as of July 2026, but INCY's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
EXEL
Exelixis, Inc.
74.1
$54.08 · $13.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.5
EXEL leads
INCY
Incyte Corporation
70.6
$127.81 · $25.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestINCY16.3x
- Fastest growthINCY+21.5%
- Strongest balance sheetINCY0.01
- Highest qualityEXEL97 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueINCY-52%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EXEL
stronger →← stronger
INCY
97
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
80
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
83
53
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
51
EXEL is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EXEL
INCY
$1.2bC+
FCF
$1.9bC+
+9.2%B
Rev
+21.5%A-
0.09B+
D/E
0.01A
17.0xA-
P/E
16.3xA-
2.56C
PEG
30.60D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EXEL
INCY
42% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
52% below
~-3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-3%/yr
+45%
1-yr DCF upside
+59%
+72%
5-yr DCF upside
+110%
+118%
10-yr DCF upside
+219%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EXEL
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
INCY
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
EXELExelixis, Inc.
Why now
Biotechnology · market cap $13.4b. 6% off the 52-week high of $57.57. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $53.00 (implying -2% upside).
Moat
Net margin 35% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 47% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 136% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
INCYIncyte Corporation
Why now
Biotechnology · market cap $25.9b. 4% off the 52-week high of $132.60. Revenue growing +21%, comfortably above the S&P median. 23 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $126.04 (implying -1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 25% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 132% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Reimbursement risk — even an approved drug can fail commercially if payors don't reimburse; pricing pressure from Medicare and large PBMs has been accelerating since 2024.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EXEL and INCY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.5 points in favor of EXEL. The widest single difference is Quality, where EXEL leads by 13.1 points.
- QualityEXEL 96.8 · INCY 83.7EXEL +13.1
- GrowthEXEL 80.0 · INCY 82.6level
- ValueEXEL 52.5 · INCY 51.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.