COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
EXE vs GPOR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EXE scored 61.1, GPOR scored 64.5 — GPOR leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. GPOR's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but EXE's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
EXE
Expand Energy Corporation
61.1
$96.09 · $22.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.4
GPOR leads
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
64.5
$173.45 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGPOR6.6x
- Fastest growthEXE+167.8%
- Strongest balance sheetEXE0.19
- Highest qualityGPOR77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueEXE-46%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EXE
stronger →← stronger
GPOR
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
60
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
GPOR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EXE
GPOR
$3.0bB
FCF
$250mC
+167.8%A
Rev
+35.2%A
0.19A-
D/E
0.50B
8.3xA-
P/E
6.6xA
1.06B+
PEG
0.36A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EXE
GPOR
46% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
41% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
+93%
1-yr DCF upside
+38%
+85%
5-yr DCF upside
+68%
+75%
10-yr DCF upside
+124%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EXE
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
- Cyclical growth
GPOR
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
EXEExpand Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $22.2b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $126.62 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +168% — in hypergrowth territory. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $125.00 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
Net margin 23% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
GPORGulfport Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $3.1b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $225.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $227.08 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EXE and GPOR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.4 points in favor of GPOR. The widest single difference is Value, where GPOR leads by 10.1 points.
- ValueEXE 59.9 · GPOR 70.0GPOR +10.1
- QualityEXE 76.0 · GPOR 76.6level
- GrowthEXE 50.0 · GPOR 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.