COMPARE · Data as of August 14, 2026

ETSY vs RVLV

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ETSY scored 60.1, RVLV scored 66.1 — RVLV leads.
Compare another set
ETSY
Etsy, Inc.
Internet Retail · Quality-Growth
60.1
$79.90 · $7.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.0
RVLV leads
RVLV
Revolve Group, Inc.
Internet Retail · Quality-Growth
66.1
$23.69 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD60.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY72.2GROWTH43.7VALUE68.6
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD66.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY61.4GROWTH75.6VALUE62.3
ETSY
stronger →← stronger
RVLV
72
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
61
44
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
ETSY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
ETSY
RVLV
$649mC+
FCF
$28mC-
+3.7%C+
Rev
+10.8%B
D/E
0.06A
25.3xC+
P/E
23.2xC+
1.04B+
PEG
1.08B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
ETSY
RVLV
3% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
294% above
~9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~55%/yr
-11%
1-yr DCF upside
-80%
+3%
5-yr DCF upside
-75%
+26%
10-yr DCF upside
-64%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
ETSY
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Short track record
RVLV
No notable signals flagged.
ETSYEtsy, Inc.
Internet Retail · $79.90 · beta 1.82
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $7.3b. 9% off the 52-week high of $87.97. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $85.92 (implying +8% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Beta 1.82 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. ROE -15% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Logistics + fulfillment cost — gross margin is sensitive to fuel, labor, and packaging costs that re-price faster than retail pricing can adjust.
RVLVRevolve Group, Inc.
Internet Retail · $23.69 · beta 1.64
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $1.7b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $31.68 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $30.85 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Beta 1.64 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. E-commerce competition — Amazon, Walmart, Shein, and Temu have each forced the rest of the category to compete on price, fulfillment speed, or assortment; sustaining margins requires one of those being structurally defended.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where ETSY and RVLV diverge

On the headline score the gap is 6.0 points in favor of RVLV. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.