COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ETR vs MWH
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ETR scored 51.4, MWH scored 72.0 — MWH leads.
Compare another set
ETR
Entergy Corporation
51.4
$104.62 · $48.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
20.6
MWH leads
MWH
SOLV Energy, Inc.
72
$28.34 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthMWH+34.8%
- Strongest balance sheetMWH0.10
- Highest qualityMWH75 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueMWH-34%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ETR
stronger →← stronger
MWH
41
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
75
76
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
95
43
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
87
MWH is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ETR
MWH
-$2.8bF
FCF
$368mC
+11.4%B
Rev
+34.8%A
1.87C
D/E
0.10A
3.7xC
P/S
—
1.93C+
PEG
1.17B+
—
P/E
48.0xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ETR
MWH
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
34% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+15%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+51%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+125%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ETR
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Diluting shareholders
MWH
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
ETREntergy Corporation
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $48.8b. 12% off the 52-week high of $118.45. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $123.53 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$2.8b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
MWHSOLV Energy, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Renewable · market cap $5.7b. Down 41% from 52-week high of $48.40 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $45.18 (implying +59% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 41% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 3.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ETR and MWH diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.6 points in favor of MWH. The widest single difference is Value, where MWH leads by 43.8 points.
- ValueETR 42.7 · MWH 86.5MWH +43.8
- QualityETR 41.4 · MWH 74.9MWH +33.5
- GrowthETR 76.5 · MWH 95.2MWH +18.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.