COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
EROC vs MWA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EROC scored 72.0, MWA scored 72.1 — MWA leads.
Compare another set
EROC
ERock, Inc.
72
$14.13 · $3.9B
Score gap
0.1
MWA leads
MWA
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS
72.1
$24.94 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestMWA17.6x
- Fastest growthEROC+42.5%
- Strongest balance sheetEROC0.12
- Highest qualityMWA75 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EROC
stronger →← stronger
MWA
58
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
75
98
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
65
98
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
77
EROC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EROC
MWA
—
FCF
$180mC
+42.5%A
Rev
+5.9%C+
0.12A
D/E
0.40B+
50.5xC
P/E
17.6xA-
0.22A
PEG
1.02B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EROC
MWA
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
52% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~13%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-33%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-34%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-35%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EROC
Why this score
- Short track record
MWA
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
EROCERock, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $3.9b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $20.70 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +43% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.22 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $22.88 (implying +62% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Trailing P/E 50.5x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Currently unprofitable (margin -66.7%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
MWAMUELLER WATER PRODUCTS
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $3.9b. 20% off the 52-week high of $31.00. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $31.00 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EROC and MWA diverge
The two are effectively level on the headline score. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthEROC 98.5 · MWA 65.0EROC +33.5
- ValueEROC 98.5 · MWA 76.9EROC +21.6
- QualityEROC 58.0 · MWA 75.0MWA +17.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.