COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

EROC vs IR

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EROC scored 72.0, IR scored 72.9 — IR leads.
Compare another set
EROC
ERock, Inc.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · Quality-Growth
72
$14.13 · $3.9B
Score gap
0.9
IR leads
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · Quality-Growth
72.9
$80.51 · $31.2B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestIR33.3x
  • Fastest growthEROC+42.5%
  • Strongest balance sheetEROC0.12
  • Highest qualityIR66 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY58.0GROWTH98.5VALUE98.5
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY65.5GROWTH76.5VALUE77.5
EROCIRQuality58.065.5Growth98.576.5Value98.577.5
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-2%53%28x55xEROCIR

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

RevEROC+42.5%IR+7.8%
D/EEROC0.12IR0.48
P/EEROC50.5xIR33.3x
PEGEROC0.22IR0.73
EROC
stronger →← stronger
IR
58
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
98
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
98
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
77
EROC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
EROC
IR
FCF
$1.2bC+
+42.5%A
Rev
+7.8%B
0.12A
D/E
0.48B+
50.5xC
P/E
33.3xC+
0.22A
PEG
0.73A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
EROC
IR
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
67% above
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~20%/yr
1-yr DCF upside
-45%
5-yr DCF upside
-40%
10-yr DCF upside
-32%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
EROC
Why this score
  • Short track record
IR
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
EROCERock, Inc.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · $14.13
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $3.9b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $20.70 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +43% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.22 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $22.88 (implying +62% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Trailing P/E 50.5x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Currently unprofitable (margin -66.7%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
IRIngersoll Rand Inc.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · $80.51 · beta 1.16
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $31.2b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $100.96 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.73 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $96.25 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where EROC and IR diverge

On the headline score the gap is 0.9 points in favor of IR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.