COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
EPAC vs MWA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EPAC scored 78.8, MWA scored 72.1 — EPAC leads.
Compare another set
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
78.8
$37.25 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.7
EPAC leads
MWA
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS
72.1
$24.94 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestMWA17.6x
- Fastest growthMWA+5.9%
- Strongest balance sheetMWA0.40
- Highest qualityEPAC86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueEPAC-12%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EPAC
stronger →← stronger
MWA
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
75
61
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
65
92
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
77
EPAC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EPAC
MWA
$112mC
FCF
$180mC
+4.3%C+
Rev
+5.9%C+
0.44B+
D/E
0.40B+
21.2xB+
P/E
17.6xA-
0.34A
PEG
1.02B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EPAC
MWA
12% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
52% above
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~13%/yr
+3%
1-yr DCF upside
-33%
+14%
5-yr DCF upside
-34%
+31%
10-yr DCF upside
-35%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EPAC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
MWA
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
EPACEnerpac Tool Group Corp.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $1.9b. 17% off the 52-week high of $45.00. PEG 0.34 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 120% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
MWAMUELLER WATER PRODUCTS
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $3.9b. 20% off the 52-week high of $31.00. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $31.00 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
EPAC leads MWA by 2.4 points (79.4 to 77.0), its sharpest advantage coming in PEG (grade A). Note they play different roles — EPAC screens as value, MWA screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EPAC and MWA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.7 points in favor of EPAC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueEPAC 92.3 · MWA 76.9EPAC +15.4
- QualityEPAC 86.2 · MWA 75.0EPAC +11.2
- GrowthEPAC 61.4 · MWA 65.0MWA +3.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.