COMPARE · Reviewed July 2, 2026
EPAC vs MSA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EPAC scored 80, MSA scored 74.3 — EPAC ahead by 5.700000000000003.
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
80
$34.87
Score gap
5.700000000000003
EPAC leads
MSA
MSA Safety Incorporated
74.3
$171.48
The companies
EPACEnerpac Tool Group Corp.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $1.8b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $45.00 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.34 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 21% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 129% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
MSAMSA Safety Incorporated
Why now
Security & Protection Services · market cap $6.6b. 18% off the 52-week high of $208.92. PEG 0.99 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $205.71 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 21% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 107% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Base grades (each contributes ~14.3% of base composite)
| EPAC | Component | MSA |
|---|---|---|
| C65 | FCF | C65 |
| C+70 | Rev | C+70 |
| B+85 | D/E | B+85 |
| B+85 | P/E or P/S | B+85 |
| A95 | PEG | B+85 |
| Supplemental signals · feed the score, not on the row card | ||
| B+85 | FCF Yield | B80 |
| A-90 | ROE | A-90 |
| 82.8 | Base composite | 80.4 |
Adjustments (signed deltas applied on top of base)
EPAC
compounder synergy (FCF yield ≥5% + ROE ≥15% + D/E <1)+4
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
Total+5
MSA
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
insider net buying (net +4.5%)+1
Total+2
DCF cross-check (per-share value vs. live price)
| EPAC upside | Horizon | MSA upside |
|---|---|---|
| +10% | 1Y | -24% |
| +29% | 5Y | -18% |
| +62% | 10Y | -8% |
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.