COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
EPAC vs LIME
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EPAC scored 78.8, LIME scored 76.9 — EPAC leads.
Compare another set
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
78.8
$36.99 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.9
EPAC leads
LIME
Neutron Holdings, Inc.
76.9
$42.03 · $2.7B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLIME12.8x
- Fastest growthLIME+29.1%
- Strongest balance sheetLIME0.20
- Highest qualityLIME91 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueEPAC-13%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EPAC
stronger →← stronger
LIME
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
91
61
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
55
92
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
90
EPAC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EPAC
LIME
$112mC
FCF
—
+4.3%C+
Rev
+29.1%A-
0.44B+
D/E
0.20A-
21.0xB+
P/E
12.8xA-
0.34A
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EPAC
LIME
13% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
+4%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+14%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+32%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EPAC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
LIME
The companies
EPACEnerpac Tool Group Corp.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $1.9b. 18% off the 52-week high of $45.00. PEG 0.34 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 120% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
LIMENeutron Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $2.7b. Trading near 52-week high of $42.68 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +29% — in hypergrowth territory. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $39.43 (implying -6% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
EPAC leads LIME by 1.9 points (78.8 to 76.9). A contrarian could still prefer LIME for its stronger Rev (grade A-). Note they play different roles — EPAC screens as value, LIME screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EPAC and LIME diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.9 points in favor of EPAC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthEPAC 61.4 · LIME 55.4EPAC +6.0
- QualityEPAC 86.2 · LIME 90.9LIME +4.7
- ValueEPAC 92.3 · LIME 90.3level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.