COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
EPAC vs EROC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EPAC scored 78.8, EROC scored 72.0 — EPAC leads.
Compare another set
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
78.8
$37.25 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.8
EPAC leads
EROC
ERock, Inc.
72
$14.13 · $3.9B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestEPAC21.2x
- Fastest growthEROC+42.5%
- Strongest balance sheetEROC0.12
- Highest qualityEPAC86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueEPAC-12%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EPAC
stronger →← stronger
EROC
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
58
61
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
98
92
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
98
EROC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EPAC
EROC
$112mC
FCF
—
+4.3%C+
Rev
+42.5%A
0.44B+
D/E
0.12A
21.2xB+
P/E
50.5xC
0.34A
PEG
0.22A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EPAC
EROC
12% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
+3%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+14%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+31%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EPAC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
EROC
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
EPACEnerpac Tool Group Corp.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $1.9b. 17% off the 52-week high of $45.00. PEG 0.34 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 120% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
EROCERock, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $3.9b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $20.70 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +43% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.22 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $22.88 (implying +62% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Trailing P/E 50.5x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Currently unprofitable (margin -66.7%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EPAC and EROC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.8 points in favor of EPAC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthEPAC 61.4 · EROC 98.5EROC +37.1
- QualityEPAC 86.2 · EROC 58.0EPAC +28.2
- ValueEPAC 92.3 · EROC 98.5EROC +6.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.