COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BLBD vs EPAC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BLBD scored 74.4, EPAC scored 78.8 — EPAC leads.
Compare another set
BLBD
Blue Bird Corporation
74.4
$61.33 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.4
EPAC leads
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
78.8
$36.99 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestBLBD7.3x
- Fastest growthBLBD+13.5%
- Strongest balance sheetBLBD0.18
- Highest qualityEPAC86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueEPAC-13%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BLBD
stronger →← stronger
EPAC
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
61
96
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
92
BLBD and EPAC split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BLBD
EPAC
$153mC
FCF
$112mC
+13.5%B+
Rev
+4.3%C+
0.18A-
D/E
0.44B+
7.3xA
P/E
21.0xB+
—
PEG
0.34A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BLBD
EPAC
22% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
13% below
~6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
-14%
1-yr DCF upside
+4%
-18%
5-yr DCF upside
+14%
-23%
10-yr DCF upside
+32%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BLBD
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
EPAC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
BLBDBlue Bird Corporation
Why now
Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery · market cap $1.9b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $83.39 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $89.13 (implying +45% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 43% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
EPACEnerpac Tool Group Corp.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $1.9b. 18% off the 52-week high of $45.00. PEG 0.34 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 120% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
EPAC leads BLBD by 4.4 points (78.8 to 74.4). A contrarian could still prefer BLBD for its stronger Rev (grade B+). All screen as value-type names but sit in different sectors (Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery versus Specialty Industrial Machinery), so their grades are relative to different peer sets.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BLBD and EPAC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.4 points in favor of EPAC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthBLBD 50.0 · EPAC 61.4EPAC +11.4
- ValueBLBD 96.1 · EPAC 92.3BLBD +3.8
- QualityBLBD 85.9 · EPAC 86.2level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.