COMPARE · Reviewed August 7, 2026
EOG vs TTE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EOG scored 65.2, TTE scored 62.9 — EOG leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. EOG's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but TTE's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
EOG
EOG Resources, Inc.
65.2
$134.74 · $70.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.3
EOG leads
TTE
TotalEnergies SE
62.9
$85.83 · $190.4B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EOG
stronger →← stronger
TTE
92
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
60
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
EOG and TTE split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EOG
TTE
$6.6bB+
FCF
$16.2bA-
+19.1%B+
Rev
-6.2%D
0.26A-
D/E
0.48B
10.5xA-
P/E
10.7xB+
1.16B+
PEG
0.71A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EOG
TTE
12% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% below
~-5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
+27%
1-yr DCF upside
+16%
+14%
5-yr DCF upside
+4%
-1%
10-yr DCF upside
-10%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EOG
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
TTE
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Revenue shrinking
The companies
EOGEOG Resources, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $70.7b. 11% off the 52-week high of $151.87. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. 27 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $158.33 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 25% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 96% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
TTETotalEnergies SE
Why now
Oil & Gas Integrated · market cap $190.4b. 9% off the 52-week high of $94.17. Revenue -6% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. PEG 0.71 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $95.00 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 121% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $190.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Revenue contracting -6% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.