COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ENS vs IR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ENS scored 69.1, IR scored 72.9 — IR leads.
Compare another set
ENS
EnerSys
69.1
$189.76 · $6.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.8
IR leads
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
72.9
$80.51 · $31.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestENS20.3x
- Fastest growthIR+7.8%
- Strongest balance sheetIR0.48
- Highest qualityENS76 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueENS-29%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ENS
stronger →← stronger
IR
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
62
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
77
IR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ENS
IR
$717mC+
FCF
$1.2bC+
+3.7%C+
Rev
+7.8%B
0.56B
D/E
0.48B+
20.3xB+
P/E
33.3xC+
1.03B+
PEG
0.73A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ENS
IR
29% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
67% above
~-4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~20%/yr
+35%
1-yr DCF upside
-45%
+41%
5-yr DCF upside
-40%
+50%
10-yr DCF upside
-32%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ENS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
IR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
ENSEnerSys
Why now
Electrical Equipment & Parts · market cap $6.8b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $244.30 — deep drawdown territory. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $252.58 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
IRIngersoll Rand Inc.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $31.2b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $100.96 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.73 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $96.25 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ENS and IR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.8 points in favor of IR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthENS 62.5 · IR 76.5IR +14.0
- QualityENS 76.2 · IR 65.5ENS +10.7
- ValueENS 69.4 · IR 77.5IR +8.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.