COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
EMN vs RPM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EMN scored 54.8, RPM scored 56.7 — RPM leads.
Compare another set
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
54.8
$73.68 · $8.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.9
RPM leads
RPM
RPM International Inc.
56.7
$108.63 · $13.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestEMN19.2x
- Fastest growthRPM+6.7%
- Strongest balance sheetEMN0.89
- Highest qualityRPM67 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EMN
stronger →← stronger
RPM
63
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
44
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
60
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
55
RPM is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EMN
RPM
$539mC+
FCF
$675mC+
-4.5%D+
Rev
+6.7%C+
0.89C
D/E
0.89C
19.2xB+
P/E
21.0xB
0.65A-
PEG
1.85C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EMN
RPM
0% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
18% above
~6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
-7%
1-yr DCF upside
-25%
0%
5-yr DCF upside
-15%
+10%
10-yr DCF upside
+1%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EMN
No notable signals flagged.
RPM
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
EMNEastman Chemical Company
Why now
Specialty Chemicals · market cap $8.4b. 12% off the 52-week high of $83.47. PEG 0.65 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $81.60 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 122% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 87% of earnings on a 4.5% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 5.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
RPMRPM International Inc.
Why now
Specialty Chemicals · market cap $13.9b. 15% off the 52-week high of $128.51. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $130.50 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
ROE 21% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 102% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EMN and RPM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.9 points in favor of RPM. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthEMN 43.5 · RPM 50.0RPM +6.5
- ValueEMN 59.7 · RPM 54.8EMN +4.9
- QualityEMN 63.2 · RPM 66.6RPM +3.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.