COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
EME vs FCN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EME scored 75.3, FCN scored 74.9 — EME leads.
Compare another set
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
75.3
$764.90 · $33.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.4
EME leads
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
74.9
$155.52 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFCN18.9x
- Fastest growthEME+18.9%
- Strongest balance sheetEME0.13
- Highest qualityEME83 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueFCN-41%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EME
stronger →← stronger
FCN
83
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
87
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
82
EME is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EME
FCN
$1.2bC+
FCF
$359mC
+18.9%B+
Rev
+7.1%B
0.13A-
D/E
0.95C+
23.8xB+
P/E
18.9xA-
0.39A
PEG
0.96B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EME
FCN
80% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
41% below
~23%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
-50%
1-yr DCF upside
+40%
-44%
5-yr DCF upside
+69%
-35%
10-yr DCF upside
+120%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EME
Why this score
- Durable high returns
FCN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
EMEEMCOR Group, Inc.
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $33.7b. 20% off the 52-week high of $951.96. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.39 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $1,033 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
ROE 35% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
FCNFTI Consulting, Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $4.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $189.30. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
The model slightly favors EME (75.3) over FCN (75.1), driven by EME's stronger Quality pillar score of 83 and its signal of durable high returns. However, a contrarian could prefer FCN for its significant 42% discount to DCF fair value and a low implied growth rate of negative 2%.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EME and FCN diverge
The two are effectively level on the headline score. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueEME 58.9 · FCN 82.0FCN +23.1
- QualityEME 83.0 · FCN 68.6EME +14.4
- GrowthEME 87.1 · FCN 74.6EME +12.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.