COMPARE · Reviewed July 2, 2026
ELPC vs VST
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ELPC scored 65.9, VST scored 73.8 — VST ahead by 7.8999999999999915.
ELPC
Companhia Paranaense de Energia
65.9
$11.61
Score gap
7.8999999999999915
VST leads
VST
Vistra Corp.
73.8
$151.05
The companies
ELPCCompanhia Paranaense de Energia
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $8.6b. 15% off the 52-week high of $13.70. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $16.93 (implying +46% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
VSTVistra Corp.
Why now
Utilities - Independent Power Producers · market cap $50.9b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $219.82 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.47 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $222.89 (implying +48% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 40% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $50.9b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
D/E 3.55 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.41 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Base grades (each contributes ~14.3% of base composite)
| ELPC | Component | VST |
|---|---|---|
| C65 | FCF | C+70 |
| B+85 | Rev | B+85 |
| A-90 | D/E | D50 |
| A-90 | P/E or P/S | C65 |
| B+85 | PEG | A95 |
| Supplemental signals · feed the score, not on the row card | ||
| B+85 | FCF Yield | B80 |
| B80 | ROE | A95 |
| 83.7 | Base composite | 77.5 |
Adjustments (signed deltas applied on top of base)
ELPC
utility structural leverage credit+2
Total+2
VST
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
high leverage (D/E 3.6)-2
analyst consensus bullish (95% buy/strong-buy)+2
insider cluster buying (net +49.5%, 29 txns)+2
forward P/E cheaper (25 → 14)+1
DCF cross-check (avg upside -33%)-1
Total+3
DCF cross-check (per-share value vs. live price)
| ELPC upside | Horizon | VST upside |
|---|---|---|
| -13% | 1Y | -52% |
| +2% | 5Y | -38% |
| +28% | 10Y | -9% |
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.