COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

ELPC vs OGS

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ELPC scored 59.4, OGS scored 67.7 — OGS leads.
Compare another set
ELPC
Companhia Paranaense de Energia
Utilities - Regulated Electric · Quality-Growth
59.4
$14.19 · $10.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.3
OGS leads
OGS
ONE Gas, Inc.
Utilities - Regulated Gas · Quality-Growth
67.7
$72.50 · $4.6B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthOGS+42.5%
  • Strongest balance sheetOGS0.96
  • Highest qualityOGS46 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD59.4/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY44.6GROWTH81.7VALUE78.7
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD67.7/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY45.7GROWTH80.4VALUE84.3
ELPCOGSQuality44.645.7Growth81.780.4Value78.784.3
FCFELPC$366mOGS-$173m
RevELPC+15.3%OGS+42.5%
D/EELPC0.98OGS0.96
PEGELPC0.61OGS6.16
ELPC
stronger →← stronger
OGS
45
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
46
82
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
80
79
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
84
OGS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
ELPC
OGS
$366mC
FCF
-$173mF
+15.3%B+
Rev
+42.5%A
0.98A-
D/E
0.96A-
17.5xB+
P/E
—
0.61A-
PEG
6.16D
—
P/S
1.8xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
ELPC
OGS
51% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~21%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
—
-43%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-34%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-18%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
ELPC
Why this score
  • Short track record
  • Foreign reporter (BRL)
OGS
Why this score
  • Diluting shareholders
ELPCCompanhia Paranaense de Energia
Utilities - Regulated Electric · $14.19 · beta 0.29
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $10.5b. Trading near 52-week high of $14.51 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.61 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $17.00 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
OGSONE Gas, Inc.
Utilities - Regulated Gas · $72.50 · beta 0.63
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Gas · market cap $4.6b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $90.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +43% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $86.17 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$173m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where ELPC and OGS diverge

On the headline score the gap is 8.3 points in favor of OGS. The widest single difference is Value, where OGS leads by 5.6 points.

Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.

Common questions

Is OGS or ELPC the better stock?

OGS scores higher: OGS 67.7, ELPC 59.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

Where do OGS and ELPC differ most?

The widest gap is value, where OGS leads by 6 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. The other two pillars are close enough to call level, so this is the one place they genuinely separate.

How are OGS and ELPC scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.