COMPARE · Data as of August 25, 2026
ADUS vs EHC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ADUS scored 74.8, EHC scored 68.1 — ADUS leads.
Compare another set
ADUS
Addus HomeCare Corporation
74.8
$121.09 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.7
ADUS leads
EHC
Encompass Health Corporation
68.1
$120.14 · $11.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestEHC20.1x
- Fastest growthADUS+15.9%
- Strongest balance sheetADUS0.09
- Highest qualityEHC68 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueADUS-18%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ADUS
stronger →← stronger
EHC
59
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
68
90
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
73
79
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
63
ADUS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ADUS
EHC
$155mC
FCF
$413mC
+15.9%B+
Rev
+9.5%B
0.09B+
D/E
0.82C
21.2xB+
P/E
20.1xA-
1.10B+
PEG
0.41A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ADUS
EHC
18% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
16% above
~0%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~10%/yr
+17%
1-yr DCF upside
-21%
+23%
5-yr DCF upside
-14%
+32%
10-yr DCF upside
-2%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ADUS
No notable signals flagged.
EHC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
ADUSAddus HomeCare Corporation
Why now
Medical Care Facilities · market cap $2.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $124.44 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $134.69 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 147% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
EHCEncompass Health Corporation
Why now
Medical Care Facilities · market cap $11.9b. 6% off the 52-week high of $127.99. PEG 0.41 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $148.17 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ADUS and EHC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.7 points in favor of ADUS. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueADUS 79.3 · EHC 63.1ADUS +16.2
- GrowthADUS 89.5 · EHC 73.5ADUS +16.0
- QualityADUS 59.0 · EHC 68.2EHC +9.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.