COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AROC vs EFXT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AROC scored 60.0, EFXT scored 60.9 — EFXT leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. AROC's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but EFXT's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
AROC
Archrock, Inc.
60
$31.80 · $5.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.9
EFXT leads
EFXT
Enerflex Ltd.
60.9
$20.34 · $2.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAROC17.1x
- Fastest growthAROC+11.5%
- Strongest balance sheetEFXT0.51
- Highest qualityAROC82 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueEFXT-43%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AROC
stronger →← stronger
EFXT
82
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
53
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
67
AROC and EFXT split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AROC
EFXT
$291mC
FCF
$326mC
+11.5%B
Rev
+6.5%C+
1.52C
D/E
0.51B
17.1xB
P/E
46.2xC
1.48B
PEG
1.17B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AROC
EFXT
20% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
43% below
~7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~0%/yr
-1%
1-yr DCF upside
+37%
+25%
5-yr DCF upside
+77%
+73%
10-yr DCF upside
+150%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AROC
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
EFXT
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
AROCArchrock, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $5.6b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $42.23 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $42.63 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 21% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
EFXTEnerflex Ltd.
Why now
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $2.5b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $29.15 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.08 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 46x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AROC and EFXT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.9 points in favor of EFXT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityAROC 81.8 · EFXT 67.1AROC +14.7
- ValueAROC 52.9 · EFXT 67.3EFXT +14.4
- GrowthAROC 50.0 · EFXT 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.