COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ED vs FE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ED scored 54.4, FE scored 62.1 — FE leads.
Compare another set
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
54.4
$106.35 · $39.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.7
FE leads
FE
FirstEnergy Corp.
62.1
$45.96 · $26.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFE1.7x
- Fastest growthFE+11.3%
- Strongest balance sheetED1.10
- Highest qualityFE55 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/S multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ED
stronger →← stronger
FE
44
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
55
62
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
82
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
FE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ED
FE
-$328mF
FCF
-$1.7bF
+8.0%B
Rev
+11.3%B
1.10B+
D/E
2.01C
2.3xB
P/S
1.7xA-
2.27C
PEG
1.68C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
ED
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
FE
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
EDConsolidated Edison, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $39.3b. 9% off the 52-week high of $116.23. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $110.53 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$328m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Net margin 0.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 1% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
FEFirstEnergy Corp.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $26.6b. 12% off the 52-week high of $52.34. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $53.25 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 2.01 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$1.7b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 97.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ED and FE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.7 points in favor of FE. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthED 62.2 · FE 81.6FE +19.4
- QualityED 44.1 · FE 55.3FE +11.2
- ValueED 58.7 · FE 53.1ED +5.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.