COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
ECG vs WMS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ECG scored 68.3, WMS scored 72.5 — WMS leads.
Compare another set
ECG
Everus Construction Group, Inc.
68.3
$122.17 · $6.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.2
WMS leads
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
72.5
$142.30 · $10.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestWMS24.2x
- Fastest growthECG+30.5%
- Strongest balance sheetECG0.47
- Highest qualityWMS81 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ECG
stronger →← stronger
WMS
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
88
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
80
47
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
59
WMS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ECG
WMS
$250mC
FCF
$550mC+
+30.5%A
Rev
+10.4%B
0.47B+
D/E
0.97C+
24.5xB+
P/E
24.2xB+
1.90C+
PEG
1.36B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ECG
WMS
37% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
20% above
~16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~15%/yr
-35%
1-yr DCF upside
-30%
-27%
5-yr DCF upside
-17%
-13%
10-yr DCF upside
+6%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ECG
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Short track record
WMS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
ECGEverus Construction Group, Inc.
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $6.2b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $171.58 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +31% — in hypergrowth territory. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $176.00 (implying +44% upside).
Moat
ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
WMSAdvanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $10.7b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $179.31 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $183.36 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 25% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 122% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ECG and WMS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.2 points in favor of WMS. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueECG 47.5 · WMS 58.8WMS +11.3
- GrowthECG 88.1 · WMS 80.1ECG +8.0
- QualityECG 76.3 · WMS 80.9WMS +4.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.