Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ECG scored 72.0, MYRG scored 68.6 — ECG leads.
Compare another set
ECG
Everus Construction Group, Inc.
Engineering & Construction · Quality-Growth
72
$122.44 · $6.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.4
ECG leads
MYRG
MYR Group Inc.
Engineering & Construction · Quality-Growth
68.6
$311.63 · $4.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestECG24.6x
Fastest growthECG+30.5%
Strongest balance sheetMYRG0.09
Highest qualityECG77 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ECG
stronger →← stronger
MYRG
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
90
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
86
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
49
ECG is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ECG
MYRG
$250mC
FCF
$193mC
+30.5%A
Rev
+16.1%B+
0.47B+
D/E
0.09A
24.6xB
P/E
29.6xB
1.33B
PEG
3.41D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ECG
MYRG
23% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
62% above
~17%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~23%/yr
-32%
1-yr DCF upside
-47%
-18%
5-yr DCF upside
-38%
+7%
10-yr DCF upside
-24%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ECG
Why this score
Durable high returns
Short track record
MYRG
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
ECGEverus Construction Group, Inc.
Engineering & Construction · $122.44
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $6.2b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $171.58 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +31% — in hypergrowth territory. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $176.00 (implying +44% upside).
Moat
ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
MYRGMYR Group Inc.
Engineering & Construction · $311.63 · beta 1.32
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $4.9b. Down 38% from 52-week high of $503.57 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $400.20 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
ROE 22% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 117% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 38% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 4.1% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ECG and MYRG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.4 points in favor of ECG. The widest single difference is Value, where ECG leads by 24.0 points.
ValueECG 73.3 · MYRG 49.3ECG +24.0
GrowthECG 89.5 · MYRG 86.0ECG +3.5
QualityECG 77.0 · MYRG 76.1level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is ECG or MYRG the better stock?
ECG scores higher: ECG 72.0, MYRG 68.6 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do ECG and MYRG differ most?
The widest gap is value, where ECG leads by 24 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. ECG also leads growth, while quality is effectively level between them.
How are ECG and MYRG scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.