COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
ECG vs EME
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ECG scored 68.3, EME scored 75.3 — EME leads.
Compare another set
ECG
Everus Construction Group, Inc.
68.3
$122.17 · $6.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.0
EME leads
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
75.3
$776.62 · $34.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestEME24.2x
- Fastest growthECG+30.5%
- Strongest balance sheetEME0.13
- Highest qualityEME83 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ECG
stronger →← stronger
EME
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
83
88
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
87
47
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
59
EME is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ECG
EME
$250mC
FCF
$1.2bC+
+30.5%A
Rev
+18.9%B+
0.47B+
D/E
0.13A-
24.5xB+
P/E
24.2xB+
1.90C+
PEG
0.40A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ECG
EME
37% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
83% above
~16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~23%/yr
-35%
1-yr DCF upside
-51%
-27%
5-yr DCF upside
-45%
-13%
10-yr DCF upside
-36%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ECG
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Short track record
EME
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
ECGEverus Construction Group, Inc.
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $6.2b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $171.58 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +31% — in hypergrowth territory. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $176.00 (implying +44% upside).
Moat
ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
EMEEMCOR Group, Inc.
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $34.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $951.96. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.40 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $1,033 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
ROE 35% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ECG and EME diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.0 points in favor of EME. The widest single difference is Value, where EME leads by 11.6 points.
- ValueECG 47.5 · EME 59.1EME +11.6
- QualityECG 76.3 · EME 82.9EME +6.6
- GrowthECG 88.1 · EME 87.1level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.