Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EBAY scored 51.3, RVLV scored 65.7 — RVLV leads.
Compare another set
EBAY
eBay Inc.
Internet Retail · Quality-Growth
51.3
$112.19 · $49.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.4
RVLV leads
RVLV
Revolve Group, Inc.
Internet Retail · Quality-Growth
65.7
$21.69 · $1.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestRVLV21.5x
Fastest growthRVLV+10.8%
Strongest balance sheetRVLV0.06
Highest qualityEBAY79 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EBAY
stronger →← stronger
RVLV
79
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
61
64
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
78
27
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
59
RVLV is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EBAY
RVLV
$2.4bB
FCF
$28mC-
+7.9%B
Rev
+10.8%B
1.53C+
D/E
0.06A
23.6xC+
P/E
21.5xC+
1.57C+
PEG
1.08B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EBAY
RVLV
59% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
350% above
~18%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~54%/yr
-40%
1-yr DCF upside
-81%
-37%
5-yr DCF upside
-78%
-32%
10-yr DCF upside
-73%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EBAY
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
RVLV
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
EBAYeBay Inc.
Internet Retail · $112.19 · beta 1.32
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $49.9b. 6% off the 52-week high of $119.31. 27 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $116.11 (implying +3% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 47% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 111% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
E-commerce competition — Amazon, Walmart, Shein, and Temu have each forced the rest of the category to compete on price, fulfillment speed, or assortment; sustaining margins requires one of those being structurally defended.
RVLVRevolve Group, Inc.
Internet Retail · $21.69 · beta 1.70
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $1.5b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $31.68 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $30.85 (implying +42% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.70 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. E-commerce competition — Amazon, Walmart, Shein, and Temu have each forced the rest of the category to compete on price, fulfillment speed, or assortment; sustaining margins requires one of those being structurally defended.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EBAY and RVLV diverge
On the headline score the gap is 14.4 points in favor of RVLV. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueEBAY 26.9 · RVLV 59.2RVLV +32.3
QualityEBAY 79.1 · RVLV 61.5EBAY +17.6
GrowthEBAY 63.6 · RVLV 77.8RVLV +14.2
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is RVLV or EBAY the better stock?
RVLV scores higher: RVLV 65.7, EBAY 51.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do RVLV and EBAY differ most?
The widest gap is value, where RVLV leads by 32 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are RVLV and EBAY scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.