Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EAT scored 67.4, WYNN scored 54.4 — EAT leads.
Compare another set
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
Restaurants · Quality-Growth
67.4
$193.87 · $8.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.0
EAT leads
WYNN
Wynn Resorts, Limited
Resorts & Casinos · Quality-Growth
54.4
$73.44 · $7.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestWYNN17.6x
Fastest growthEAT+7.9%
Highest qualityEAT81 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueWYNN-46%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EAT
stronger →← stronger
WYNN
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
57
73
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
52
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
56
EAT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EAT
WYNN
$558mC+
FCF
$792mC+
+7.9%B
Rev
+6.4%C+
3.96D
D/E
Negative equity
17.8xB
P/E
17.6xB
1.70C+
PEG
0.67A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EAT
WYNN
3% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
46% below
~8%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-8%/yr
-10%
1-yr DCF upside
+71%
-3%
5-yr DCF upside
+85%
+8%
10-yr DCF upside
+108%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EAT
Why this score
Buying back stock
Durable high returns
WYNN
Why this score
Cyclical growth
The companies
EATBrinker International, Inc.
Restaurants · $193.87 · beta 1.26
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $8.1b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $254.99 — deep drawdown territory. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $262.59 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
D/E 3.96 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
WYNNWynn Resorts, Limited
Resorts & Casinos · $73.44 · beta 0.95
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $7.6b. Down 45% from 52-week high of $134.72 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.67 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $130.96 (implying +78% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 176% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 45% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EAT and WYNN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.0 points in favor of EAT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
QualityEAT 80.8 · WYNN 57.2EAT +23.6
GrowthEAT 73.4 · WYNN 50.0EAT +23.4
ValueEAT 51.7 · WYNN 56.2WYNN +4.5
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is EAT or WYNN the better stock?
EAT scores higher: EAT 67.4, WYNN 54.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do EAT and WYNN differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where EAT leads by 24 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are EAT and WYNN scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.